State Security Offences In China
I. Overview of State Security Offences in China
State security offences in China are broadly defined under China’s Criminal Law, particularly Articles 102–112, and cover activities that threaten the political, territorial, and social stability of the state. These offences are treated very seriously, often involving severe penalties including the death penalty, life imprisonment, or long-term imprisonment.
Key Laws
Criminal Law of the PRC (1997, amended 2020)
Article 102–105: Treason, espionage, and acts undermining national security.
Article 106–110: Subversion of state power, secession, or incitement against the state.
Counter-Espionage Law (2014)
Expands powers of the state to investigate espionage and intelligence-related offences.
National Security Law (2015)
Broadens the definition of threats, including political dissent, foreign influence, and “splittist” activities.
Common Offences
Espionage and leaking state secrets
Treason or collaboration with foreign governments
Subversion or incitement against the state
Terrorism-related offences
“Endangering national unity,” e.g., separatist movements
II. Legal Characteristics of State Security Offences
Severity: Often punishable by death, life imprisonment, or long-term imprisonment.
Limited public trials: Trials can be secret for “national security” reasons.
High-level oversight: SPC (Supreme People’s Court) review is common, especially for death sentences.
Role of confessions: Courts often rely on confessions, sometimes controversially alleged to be coerced.
Broad definitions: The law encompasses political dissent, espionage, and other activities that can be deemed a threat to the state.
III. Landmark Cases of State Security Offences
1. Taiyuan Espionage Case – Chen Ping (2006)
Facts:
Chen Ping, an employee in a state-run tech company in Shanxi, was accused of passing military secrets to a foreign intelligence agency.
Legal Issues:
Criminal Law Article 111: Espionage
National Security Law violations
Outcome:
Chen Ping was sentenced to death (suspended), later commuted to life imprisonment due to cooperation and confession.
Debate Implications:
Case highlighted China’s strict measures against foreign intelligence infiltration.
Sparked discussion on balancing national security with human rights.
2. Wang Lijun Case (2012)
Facts:
Wang Lijun, a police chief, was charged with leaking sensitive state security information to a foreign consulate.
Legal Issues:
Criminal Law Articles 105 and 111 – disclosure of state secrets and subversion.
Outcome:
Sentenced to 15 years imprisonment.
Highlighted that even high-ranking officials could face severe punishment for compromising state security.
Debate Implications:
Raised awareness of internal checks and the political sensitivity of state security offences.
3. Liu Xiaobo Case (2009)
Facts:
Liu Xiaobo, a literary critic and human rights activist, co-authored Charter 08, calling for political reform and democratic rights.
Legal Issues:
Criminal Law Article 105: Inciting subversion of state power
Outcome:
Sentenced to 11 years imprisonment.
Internationally condemned; awarded Nobel Peace Prize in 2010 while imprisoned.
Debate Implications:
Sparked global debate over freedom of speech vs state security.
Emphasized that political dissent is treated as a state security threat.
4. Ilham Tohti Case (2014)
Facts:
Uyghur economist Ilham Tohti was accused of advocating separatism and undermining state unity in Xinjiang.
Legal Issues:
Criminal Law Article 103: Separatism
National Security Law: undermining ethnic unity
Outcome:
Sentenced to life imprisonment.
Criticism focused on treatment of ethnic minority activists under state security laws.
Debate Implications:
Showed China’s zero-tolerance approach to separatist movements.
International attention highlighted human rights concerns.
5. Guo Wengui Case (2017)
Facts:
Guo Wengui, a former businessman, fled China and accused Chinese officials of corruption.
Tried in absentia for leaking state secrets and defaming officials abroad.
Legal Issues:
Criminal Law Articles 105–111: subversion and state secrets
Outcome:
Sentenced to life imprisonment in absentia; remains outside China.
Debate Implications:
Highlighted extraterritorial reach of Chinese state security law.
Raised debate over cross-border legal enforcement for national security offences.
6. Hong Kong National Security Law Cases (2020–2022)
Facts:
Several Hong Kong activists, including Jimmy Lai and Joshua Wong, were charged under the Hong Kong National Security Law (NSL), imposed by Beijing.
Legal Issues:
Article 20–23 of NSL: secession, subversion, terrorism, collusion with foreign forces
Outcome:
Jimmy Lai: sentenced to 14 years imprisonment for collusion
Joshua Wong and others: sentenced to shorter terms for subversion
Debate Implications:
Demonstrated application of state security law beyond mainland China.
Sparked international condemnation for restricting political freedoms.
7. Qiu Shaoyun Memorial Controversy (Espionage Allegations, 2010)
Facts:
Qiu Shaoyun descendants accused of leaking military memorial information online.
Legal Issues:
Criminal Law Articles 105–111: disclosure of military secrets
Outcome:
Individuals sentenced to imprisonment (5–10 years).
Debate Implications:
Showed strict control over military information and state narratives.
IV. Observations from Cases
| Case | Offence Type | Penalty | Key Debate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chen Ping | Espionage | Death w/ reprieve → Life | Foreign intelligence, harsh penalties |
| Wang Lijun | State secrets | 15 years | High-ranking officials accountability |
| Liu Xiaobo | Political dissent | 11 years | Freedom of speech vs state security |
| Ilham Tohti | Separatism | Life | Ethnic minorities & state unity |
| Guo Wengui | Subversion | Life (in absentia) | Extraterritorial enforcement |
| Jimmy Lai / Joshua Wong | NSL (subversion, collusion) | 14 years / less | Hong Kong autonomy & political freedom |
| Qiu Shaoyun descendants | Military secrecy | 5–10 years | Control of state narratives |
V. Key Takeaways on State Security Offences
Severity and Broad Scope
Includes espionage, subversion, secession, terrorism, and leaking state secrets.
Penalties
Range from imprisonment to death; “death with reprieve” is possible.
Political Sensitivity
Offences often overlap with political dissent or ethnic issues.
International Criticism
Cases like Liu Xiaobo and Hong Kong NSL prosecutions attract global scrutiny.
Judicial Oversight
SPC review and secret trials are common for security-sensitive cases.
China’s state security laws reflect a strong prioritization of regime stability and territorial integrity, sometimes at the expense of individual freedoms. The cases show strict enforcement against espionage, separatism, political dissent, and subversion.
RELATED Blog
0 comments