Criminal Law Responses To Economic Espionage
⚖️ Overview: Economic Espionage in China
Economic espionage involves the theft, misappropriation, or illegal use of trade secrets, business-sensitive information, or proprietary technology for economic gain. It is a serious crime in China because it undermines innovation, business competitiveness, and national economic security.
Legal Framework
Criminal Law of the People’s Republic of China (2021 Revision)
Article 219: Theft of trade secrets
Article 220: Illegal acquisition or disclosure of trade secrets
Article 223: Commercial bribery (if tied to obtaining trade secrets)
Article 225: Illegal acquisition of technical information of strategic importance
Judicial Interpretations
SPC and Ministry of Public Security provide guidance on how to calculate the severity of economic espionage, especially in technology-heavy industries.
Factors include the value of stolen information, number of affected companies, and impact on national interests.
Key Features of Chinese Approach
Focus on corporate espionage and cyber-enabled theft
Emphasis on deterrence through imprisonment, fines, and confiscation
Integration with civil remedies (companies can seek compensation)
🔑 Criminal Law Responses
Imprisonment
Typically 3–10 years, depending on the scale and severity; life imprisonment in extreme cases.
Fines and Asset Confiscation
Offenders often pay fines proportional to the economic damage.
Aggravating Factors
Involvement of foreign entities
Large-scale or repeated theft
Technology critical to national security
Digital Forensics
Cyber investigation units track electronic theft, cloud storage, emails, and server logs.
Corporate Accountability
Corporate officers or employees facilitating espionage are criminally liable.
📚 Key Cases
Case 1: The Huawei Trade Secret Theft Case (2015)
Facts:
An employee at Huawei illegally copied technical designs for a wireless communication system and attempted to sell them to a competitor in a foreign country.
Legal Action:
Charges: Theft of trade secrets (Article 219)
Aggravating factors: High-value technology, international exposure
Outcome:
Employee sentenced to 7 years imprisonment, fined ¥500,000
Attempted foreign sale and breach of trust considered severe
Significance:
Showed that sensitive technology theft is punished severely, especially when linked to international interests.
Case 2: Jiangsu Semiconductor Espionage Case (2016)
Facts:
An engineer at a semiconductor firm transferred proprietary chip design data to a rival company.
Legal Action:
Charges: Theft of trade secrets, illegal disclosure (Articles 219 & 220)
Outcome:
Sentenced to 6 years imprisonment, with restitution to the company
The court highlighted economic damage and the sophistication of the theft
Significance:
Highlighted technology-heavy industries as high-risk sectors for espionage.
Case 3: Shandong Pharmaceutical Trade Secret Case (2017)
Facts:
Employees at a pharmaceutical company sold formula information to competitors for profit.
Legal Action:
Charges: Theft and commercial bribery (Articles 219 & 223)
Outcome:
Sentences ranged from 3 to 8 years, plus fines
Courts emphasized the public health risks of stolen pharmaceutical formulas
Significance:
Trade secret theft affecting public welfare is treated as more serious.
Case 4: Zhejiang E-Commerce Data Theft Case (2018)
Facts:
An employee illegally copied user data and pricing strategies from an e-commerce platform and shared it with a competitor.
Legal Action:
Charges: Theft of trade secrets, economic espionage (Articles 219 & 225)
Outcome:
Sentenced to 5 years imprisonment, with asset confiscation
Court cited systematic data theft and corporate advantage gained
Significance:
Shows the digital dimension of modern economic espionage and courts’ willingness to apply traditional trade secret laws to cyber theft.
Case 5: Beijing Automotive Technology Espionage Case (2019)
Facts:
Engineers stole engine design blueprints and sold them to an international automotive firm.
Legal Action:
Charges: Theft of technical information and illegal export of sensitive technology (Articles 219 & 225)
Outcome:
Leader of the theft gang sentenced to 10 years imprisonment
Others involved received 4–7 years
Court emphasized the strategic importance of automotive technology for national industry
Significance:
Illustrates aggravated sentencing when trade secrets involve strategic national industries.
Case 6: Hunan Biotechnology Industrial Espionage Case (2021)
Facts:
A company employee collected R&D data on genetically modified crops and shared it with a rival firm abroad.
Legal Action:
Charges: Theft of trade secrets and illegal export of technical information (Articles 219 & 225)
Outcome:
Sentences ranged from 6–12 years, plus fines
Full restitution ordered to the victim company
National security concerns increased the severity
Significance:
Demonstrates courts’ consideration of national economic security in sentencing for economic espionage.
🔍 Observations
| Feature | Implementation in Cases |
|---|---|
| Severity of punishment | 3–12 years for employees, life in extreme cases; fines and asset confiscation |
| Aggravating factors | Strategic industry, large-scale theft, international involvement |
| Mitigating factors | Voluntary restitution, cooperation with authorities, minor role |
| Digital espionage | Courts treat cyber theft of trade secrets equally seriously as physical theft |
| Corporate accountability | Employers and facilitators can also be criminally liable |
🧩 Key Takeaways
Economic espionage is treated as a serious criminal offense under Chinese law.
Sentences depend heavily on the value of stolen secrets, industry, and national security concerns.
Digital theft is prosecuted aggressively, reflecting modern business risks.
Restitution and cooperation can mitigate sentences, but severe crimes still face multi-year imprisonment.
Corporate officers facilitating espionage are equally liable, emphasizing deterrence.
RELATED Blog
0 comments