Constitutional Law at Eritrea

Constitutional law in Eritrea is shaped by its history of struggle for independence, its national identity, and the centralized nature of its political system. Eritrea became independent from Ethiopia in 1993 following a long and bloody war for independence, and its constitution was adopted soon after. However, the country has not fully implemented the constitution, and its political system is characterized by authoritarian rule.

Here's a detailed look at Eritrea's constitutional law:

🏛️ Constitutional Framework of Eritrea

1. Historical Context and Independence

Eritrea was an Italian colony until 1941, after which it became a part of Ethiopia under a federal arrangement. This union was dissolved in 1962, leading to a prolonged armed struggle for independence, led by the Eritrean People’s Liberation Front (EPLF).

After years of conflict, Eritrea gained independence from Ethiopia in 1993, following a UN-supervised referendum where the majority of Eritreans voted for independence.

2. The Constitution of Eritrea

Eritrea’s Constitution was adopted in 1997. The constitution established the country as a unitary presidential republic with democratic principles such as the separation of powers, the protection of human rights, and the creation of democratic institutions.

Despite its adoption, the constitution has never been fully implemented, and the country operates under the laws of the ruling party, the People’s Front for Democracy and Justice (PFDJ), led by Isaias Afwerki, who has been in power since independence.

3. Key Features of Eritrea's Constitution (1997)

Separation of Powers: The constitution establishes the separation of powers among the executive, legislative, and judicial branches of government.

Executive: The President is both the head of state and head of government.

Legislature: The constitution establishes a bicameral legislature consisting of:

National Assembly (with members elected by the people),

People’s Assembly (representing local governments and councils).

Judiciary: The constitution guarantees the independence of the judiciary, but in practice, the judiciary is heavily influenced by the executive.

Fundamental Rights: The constitution guarantees a broad range of human rights, such as freedom of speech, freedom of assembly, freedom of religion, and protection from torture.

However, the government has largely disregarded these rights in practice. There is no press freedom, and political opposition is heavily suppressed.

Democratic Elections: The constitution sets out the framework for multi-party elections. However, despite these provisions, elections have never been held since independence, and the ruling party, the PFDJ, controls all aspects of political life.

4. Authoritarian Rule and the Lack of Implementation

President Isaias Afwerki, who has ruled Eritrea since its independence, has maintained power through a combination of military and political control. His government has never held the promised elections and has instead governed by decree.

Eritrea has operated under an "interim" government since 1997, with no clear date set for the implementation of the constitution. The political system remains highly centralized, and opposition parties are not allowed to function freely. The ruling party, the PFDJ, is the only political party in the country.

5. National Service and Military Control

National Service is compulsory for all citizens, which often results in indefinite military conscription, forcing many Eritreans to serve in the military or civil service for long periods. This practice has been heavily criticized as a form of forced labor and a source of human rights violations.

Military Rule: The government operates under military control, with many government positions filled by military officers. The military plays a central role in all aspects of Eritrean life, and there are no civilian checks on its power.

6. Suppression of Political Freedoms and Human Rights

Freedom of the press is severely restricted in Eritrea. The government controls all media outlets, and independent journalists are often arrested, detained, or forced into exile.

Political prisoners: The government has been widely criticized for its imprisonment of dissidents, human rights activists, and political opposition leaders. Some prisoners have been detained without trial for years or even decades.

Religious freedom is also limited, with the government restricting religious practice and often persecuting Christian and Muslim groups that are not officially recognized by the state.

7. Foreign Policy and International Relations

Eritrea’s foreign policy is largely defined by its hostile relations with neighboring Ethiopia until the peace agreement signed in 2018, which ended a 20-year border conflict. However, Eritrea remains highly isolated internationally, with a poor human rights record and a lack of cooperation with global organizations.

Eritrea is a member of regional organizations, such as the African Union (AU) and the Intergovernmental Authority on Development (IGAD).

8. Recent Developments

Peace with Ethiopia: In 2018, Eritrea and Ethiopia signed a peace agreement, formally ending the 1998–2000 border war. This was a significant development, though the political landscape within Eritrea has not substantially changed.

The government has continued to face international pressure regarding human rights abuses, including from United Nations bodies and human rights organizations, but the regime's control over the country remains strong.

Key Constitutional Principles:

Unitary State: Eritrea is a highly centralized state with power concentrated in the presidency.

Presidential System: The President holds almost absolute power, with few checks from other branches of government.

Human Rights and Civil Liberties: While the constitution guarantees fundamental rights, the reality in Eritrea is that human rights are often violated, and civil liberties are severely restricted.

Authoritarian Rule: The lack of democratic elections and the suppression of opposition characterize Eritrea’s political system.

 

LEAVE A COMMENT

0 comments