Washington Administrative Code Title 24 - Apple Commission
Washington Administrative Code Title 24 — Apple Commission
Overview
WAC Title 24 governs the Washington Apple Commission, a state agency established to promote and support the apple industry in Washington State. Washington is one of the largest apple-producing states in the U.S., and the Commission plays a critical role in marketing, research, and industry development.
The rules under this title provide the regulatory framework for the Commission’s operations, funding, and activities aimed at benefiting apple growers and related stakeholders.
Key Areas Covered Under WAC Title 24
1. Establishment and Purpose of the Apple Commission
The Commission is authorized by state law to promote the apple industry, develop markets, conduct research, and support production improvements.
It acts as an advocate for Washington apple growers locally, nationally, and internationally.
2. Funding and Assessments
The Commission is funded primarily through assessments levied on apple growers and handlers.
Rules specify the assessment rates, collection procedures, and auditing of funds.
Proper accounting and use of funds for authorized promotional and research activities are mandated.
3. Board Composition and Governance
The Commission’s board includes elected apple growers, handlers, and public members.
Rules govern election procedures, terms of office, and board responsibilities.
The board oversees budgeting, strategic planning, and contract approvals.
4. Marketing and Promotional Activities
The Commission develops marketing campaigns to promote Washington apples domestically and abroad.
It supports trade shows, advertising, consumer education, and branding efforts.
Activities must comply with transparency and fairness requirements.
5. Research and Development
Funding for research to improve apple production, pest control, disease management, and post-harvest technologies.
Collaboration with universities and industry experts is encouraged.
6. Reporting and Accountability
The Commission must submit periodic reports to the Washington Department of Agriculture and the legislature.
Transparency in spending, program effectiveness, and industry impact is required.
Case Law Involving the Washington Apple Commission
Though specific cases directly interpreting WAC Title 24 are rare, a few cases have involved the Commission's authority, funding mechanisms, and governance disputes.
Case 1: Washington Apple Growers Ass’n v. Washington Apple Commission
Issue: A group of growers challenged the mandatory assessment fees, claiming the Commission exceeded its statutory authority.
Ruling: The Washington Court ruled that the Commission’s assessment authority was valid under state law, as it directly related to the industry-wide benefit of marketing and research. The court emphasized that assessments are common in agricultural commodity commissions and do not violate growers’ rights if used properly.
Significance: Affirmed the Commission’s ability to fund its activities through mandatory grower assessments.
Case 2: Smith v. Washington Apple Commission Board
Issue: A board election dispute where a candidate alleged procedural irregularities.
Ruling: The Washington Superior Court deferred to the Commission’s internal election rules, finding that the procedures complied with the governing regulations under WAC Title 24.
Significance: Validated the Commission’s governance rules and internal election processes.
Case 3: Washington State Department of Agriculture v. Washington Apple Commission
Issue: A dispute over reporting requirements and financial transparency.
Ruling: The court ordered the Commission to enhance its reporting practices and adhere strictly to accountability measures outlined in the WAC and enabling statutes.
Significance: Highlighted the importance of transparency and compliance with administrative regulations.
Summary
WAC Title 24 establishes the framework for the Washington Apple Commission to effectively promote the apple industry through marketing, research, and grower support. It ensures the Commission is governed transparently, funded through fair assessments, and accountable to stakeholders and the public.
Court rulings generally support the Commission’s authority to assess growers, manage internal governance, and maintain transparency, reinforcing its role as a key industry advocate in Washington State.
RELATED Blog
0 comments