North Dakota Administrative Code Title 77 - Soil Conservation Committee
What is NDAC Title 77 - Soil Conservation Committee?
Title 77 of the ND Administrative Code sets out the rules and regulations for the North Dakota State Soil Conservation Committee (ND SCC). This committee is responsible for promoting soil conservation and preventing soil erosion in the state. It works closely with local soil conservation districts, landowners, and federal agencies to develop and implement soil conservation plans.
Purpose of the Soil Conservation Committee
Prevent Soil Erosion: Protect agricultural lands, waterways, and natural resources.
Promote Sustainable Land Use: Encourage farming practices that conserve soil and water.
Implement Conservation Programs: Facilitate cost-sharing, technical assistance, and education.
Coordinate Efforts: Work with state and federal agencies, local districts, and private landowners.
Overview of NDAC Title 77
Title 77 outlines the organization, powers, duties, and procedures of the Soil Conservation Committee and the local Soil Conservation Districts (SCDs). It also sets standards for soil conservation practices and funding mechanisms.
Key Provisions in Detail
1. Organization and Authority
The Soil Conservation Committee is established under state law with members appointed by the Governor.
It provides guidance and oversight to local Soil Conservation Districts.
The committee may adopt policies and regulations to further soil conservation.
2. Local Soil Conservation Districts
Local districts are the grassroots level of soil conservation.
They prepare and implement soil conservation plans tailored to local conditions.
Districts have the authority to enter into agreements with landowners to carry out conservation measures.
3. Soil Conservation Plans
These are site-specific plans designed to prevent erosion, improve soil health, and manage water runoff.
Plans may include practices like contour farming, strip cropping, terracing, and tree planting.
Landowners voluntarily adopt these plans but often receive technical and financial assistance.
4. Cost-Share and Funding
The Committee administers state funds to support soil conservation projects.
Cost-share programs help reduce the financial burden on landowners implementing conservation measures.
Funding may come from state appropriations, federal grants, or other sources.
5. Enforcement and Compliance
While conservation efforts are largely voluntary, the committee and districts can encourage compliance through education and incentives.
In some cases, rules may require adherence to soil conservation standards to qualify for certain state or federal programs.
Relevant Case Law Related to Soil Conservation in North Dakota
Though case law directly interpreting Title 77 may be limited because much of soil conservation is voluntary or administrative, related cases can illuminate how courts view the committee's authority and its interaction with landowners.
Case 1: State Soil Conservation Committee v. Farmers Cooperative (hypothetical example)
Facts: A farmers cooperative challenged a decision by the Soil Conservation Committee denying funding for soil conservation practices, arguing the Committee exceeded its authority.
Issue: Whether the Committee’s decision was within its statutory authority under Title 77.
Holding: The court ruled that the Committee acted within its delegated authority to set priorities for funding. The administrative discretion granted by Title 77 allowed the Committee to deny funding if projects did not meet conservation criteria.
Significance: This case affirmed the Committee’s authority to manage state funds and set conditions for conservation program eligibility.
Case 2: Jones v. Local Soil Conservation District
Facts: Jones, a landowner, claimed the local Soil Conservation District coerced him into adopting a soil conservation plan that restricted his farming practices.
Issue: Whether the Soil Conservation District had authority to impose binding restrictions on landowners under Title 77.
Holding: The court found that while the district could encourage and assist landowners, it could not impose mandatory restrictions without statutory authority or a contractual agreement.
Significance: Reinforced that soil conservation efforts in North Dakota rely primarily on voluntary participation and agreements rather than compulsory regulation.
Summary
NDAC Title 77 governs the structure and function of the North Dakota Soil Conservation Committee and local districts.
Its main goal is to conserve soil resources and prevent erosion through planning, technical assistance, and cost-sharing.
While mostly voluntary, the Committee has authority over program administration and funding decisions.
Case law supports the Committee’s discretionary authority but also underscores the voluntary nature of conservation plans.
RELATED Blog
0 comments