Excusing Conditions under Contracts
Excusing Conditions in Contracts
1. Introduction
In contract law, an excusing condition refers to a situation or event that releases a party from their contractual obligations without liability because fulfilling the contract has become impossible, illegal, or fundamentally different from what was agreed upon.
2. What Are Excusing Conditions?
Excusing conditions are circumstances that justify non-performance of a contract. They protect parties when unexpected events occur that are beyond their control, making performance impractical or unfair.
Common Types of Excusing Conditions:
Impossibility of Performance: When it is literally impossible to perform the contract.
Frustration of Purpose: When the fundamental reason for entering the contract no longer exists.
Illegality: When performance becomes illegal due to changes in law.
Force Majeure: Extraordinary events (like natural disasters) that prevent performance.
3. Explanation of Each Excusing Condition
a. Impossibility of Performance
Occurs when performance cannot physically be done.
Example: If you contract to sell a specific car but the car is destroyed before delivery, you cannot be held liable.
b. Frustration of Purpose
The main purpose of the contract is defeated by unforeseen events.
Example: You rent a hall for a parade, but the parade is canceled by the city. The purpose is frustrated, so you may be excused from paying rent.
c. Illegality
Performance becomes illegal after the contract is formed.
Example: You contract to import goods, but a new law bans those goods; the contract cannot be performed legally.
d. Force Majeure
Refers to extraordinary, uncontrollable events (natural disasters, war).
Contracts often have force majeure clauses specifying these conditions.
4. Important Case Law
Case 1: Taylor v. Caldwell
Facts: Parties contracted to use a music hall for concerts. Before the event, the hall was destroyed by fire.
Issue: Whether the contract was breached.
Holding: The contract was excused due to impossibility of performance because the hall no longer existed.
Significance: Established the doctrine of impossibility as an excusing condition.
Case 2: Krell v. Henry
Facts: A man rented a room to watch the coronation parade, which was canceled due to the King’s illness.
Issue: Whether the renter must pay despite the cancellation.
Holding: The contract was excused due to frustration of purpose—the main reason for the contract no longer existed.
Significance: Clarified that frustration of purpose can excuse contractual performance.
Case 3: Fibrosa Spolka Akcyjna v. Fairbairn Lawson Combe Barbour Ltd.
Facts: A contract for the sale of machinery was frustrated by war, making the contract illegal to perform.
Issue: Whether the contract was discharged.
Holding: The contract was discharged due to illegality caused by war.
Significance: Established illegality as a valid excusing condition.
5. Summary
| Excusing Condition | Explanation | Example | Case Example |
|---|---|---|---|
| Impossibility | Performance cannot physically occur | Destruction of the subject matter | Taylor v. Caldwell |
| Frustration of Purpose | Main purpose is destroyed by unforeseen event | Cancellation of a public event | Krell v. Henry |
| Illegality | Performance becomes illegal after contract | War or law banning contract activity | Fibrosa case |
| Force Majeure | Extraordinary events beyond control | Natural disasters, war | Depends on contract clauses |
6. Conclusion
Excusing conditions serve to balance fairness in contractual obligations. When performance is made impossible or pointless by events outside the parties’ control, the law provides relief by excusing performance and discharging obligations without fault.
RELATED Blog
0 comments