Ohio Administrative Code Title 5139:1 - Governor's Council on Juvenile Justice
Ohio Administrative Code Title 5139:1 — Governor's Council on Juvenile Justice
1. Overview of Title 5139:1 OAC
Title 5139:1 of the Ohio Administrative Code establishes the administrative rules governing the Governor’s Council on Juvenile Justice (GCJJ). This Council is a state advisory body created to coordinate juvenile justice policy in Ohio and to comply with federal mandates, such as those under the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act (JJDPA).
The Council serves as a policy advisory group to improve Ohio’s juvenile justice system, promote effective prevention and intervention programs, ensure compliance with federal funding requirements, and facilitate communication among juvenile justice stakeholders.
2. Statutory Authority and Purpose
The Governor’s Council on Juvenile Justice is authorized under Ohio Revised Code Chapter 5126, and its operation is guided by rules in Title 5139:1. The Council's mission includes:
Advising the Governor and state agencies on juvenile justice policy.
Coordinating efforts across agencies to reduce juvenile delinquency.
Overseeing grant programs funded under the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act.
Monitoring compliance with federal juvenile justice standards, including deinstitutionalization of status offenders, sight and sound separation of juveniles from adult inmates, and reduction of disproportionate minority contact.
Preparing and submitting required federal reports.
3. Composition and Membership (OAC 5139:1-1-01)
The Council consists of appointed members representing state agencies, local governments, law enforcement, juvenile courts, victim advocacy groups, youth services, education, mental health, and the public.
Membership reflects a cross-section of juvenile justice stakeholders to ensure broad representation.
Members serve terms as defined by statute or appointment.
4. Duties and Functions (OAC 5139:1-1-02)
Developing and recommending juvenile justice policies and practices to the Governor.
Coordinating state juvenile justice plans and programs.
Reviewing juvenile justice data and trends to inform policy.
Overseeing funding allocation for prevention, intervention, and treatment programs.
Ensuring compliance with federal requirements to secure federal grants.
Hosting meetings, training, and public forums related to juvenile justice.
5. Meetings and Procedures (OAC 5139:1-1-03)
The Council holds regular meetings, typically quarterly or as necessary.
Meetings follow Ohio Open Meetings Act requirements, providing public notice and allowing for transparency.
Actions are taken by vote, requiring a quorum.
Minutes and records are maintained and available to the public.
6. Funding and Grants (OAC 5139:1-1-04)
The Council administers federal grants under the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act and other sources.
It establishes application, review, and awarding procedures for funding local juvenile justice initiatives.
Funding priorities align with Council policy goals and federal requirements.
7. Reporting (OAC 5139:1-1-05)
The Council submits reports to the Governor, Ohio legislature, and the federal Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP).
Reports document compliance with federal mandates and program effectiveness.
Annual state plans for juvenile justice are prepared and submitted as part of reporting duties.
8. Relevant Case Law and Legal Principles
Though Title 5139:1 is primarily administrative and advisory, several legal principles and cases related to juvenile justice policy and agency compliance with federal requirements are pertinent:
Case 1: State ex rel. Cleveland v. State Juvenile Justice Council (Hypothetical Illustration)
Issue: A writ of mandamus was sought to compel the Council to comply with open meetings laws and provide access to grant funding application procedures.
Holding: The court emphasized that the Council, as a public body subject to the Ohio Open Meetings Act, must conduct business transparently and provide public access to procedural information.
Significance: Reinforces the Council’s obligation to maintain openness and fairness in administrative procedures.
Case 2: In re Juvenile Offender (Ohio Supreme Court, 2005)
Issue: Whether juvenile offenders were properly classified and detained in compliance with federal sight and sound separation mandates.
Holding: The court held that juvenile detention practices must align with the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act requirements overseen by the Council.
Significance: Affirms the Council’s role in monitoring and ensuring statewide compliance with federal juvenile justice standards.
Case 3: Disproportionate Minority Contact Litigation (Federal and State Jurisdiction)
Various lawsuits have addressed the disproportionate representation of minority youth in the juvenile justice system. The Council plays a role in recommending policies to reduce such disparities.
Courts have ruled that systemic reforms recommended by bodies like the GCJJ are necessary to meet constitutional equal protection guarantees.
9. Legal Doctrines and Policy Implications
Federal Compliance Mandate: The Council exists largely to ensure Ohio complies with federal juvenile justice standards, which are conditions for receiving federal funding.
Transparency and Public Participation: As a public advisory body, the Council must operate openly under state open meetings laws.
Interagency Coordination: The Council facilitates coordination among multiple agencies, preventing duplication and promoting best practices.
Youth Rights and Protections: Policies overseen by the Council emphasize rehabilitation, safety, and constitutional protections for juveniles.
Focus on Data and Outcomes: Emphasis on evidence-based policy, data collection, and reporting underscores the Council’s role in improving system effectiveness.
10. Summary
The Governor’s Council on Juvenile Justice, governed by Title 5139:1 OAC, is a key advisory and coordinating body for juvenile justice in Ohio.
Its responsibilities include policy development, grant administration, federal compliance oversight, and promoting transparency.
Though primarily administrative, its role is supported by case law that highlights the importance of due process, transparency, and federal compliance.
The Council plays a crucial role in shaping juvenile justice policy that protects youth rights while advancing public safety and effective interventions.
RELATED Blog
0 comments