South Carolina Code of Regulations Chapter 120 - DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, LICENSING AND REGULATION- BOARD OF VETERINARY MEDICAL EXAMINERS
South Carolina Code of Regulations Chapter 120 — Board of Veterinary Medical Examiners
1. Overview
Chapter 120 governs the Board of Veterinary Medical Examiners (BVME) under the Department of Labor, Licensing, and Regulation in South Carolina. The Board regulates the practice of veterinary medicine in the state to ensure the delivery of competent and ethical veterinary services for the protection of animal and public health.
The regulations set out the licensing, practice standards, disciplinary procedures, and continuing education requirements for veterinarians and veterinary technicians.
2. Purpose and Scope
To protect animal health and welfare as well as public safety.
To license qualified veterinarians and veterinary technicians.
To establish professional and ethical standards for veterinary practice.
To investigate complaints and discipline practitioners who violate rules or laws.
To promote continuing competence through education and regulation.
3. Key Provisions
a. Licensing Requirements
Applicants must meet educational prerequisites, including graduation from accredited veterinary schools.
Passage of required examinations (such as the North American Veterinary Licensing Examination) is mandatory.
The Board issues licenses for:
Veterinarians,
Veterinary Technicians.
Requirements for license renewal include payment of fees and fulfillment of continuing education credits.
b. Standards of Practice
Veterinarians must provide services consistent with current professional standards.
Required to maintain accurate records of treatments and diagnoses.
Prohibited from engaging in fraudulent, incompetent, or unethical conduct.
Rules govern the prescription and dispensing of medications.
c. Continuing Education
Licensed veterinarians and technicians must complete specified hours of continuing education to maintain competency.
Topics may include clinical skills, ethics, public health, and legal updates.
d. Disciplinary Procedures
The Board has the authority to investigate complaints.
Grounds for discipline include negligence, incompetence, fraud, unprofessional conduct, or violations of laws and regulations.
Possible sanctions include:
Reprimands,
Probation,
Suspension,
Revocation of license,
Monetary fines.
e. Complaint and Hearing Process
Complaints are reviewed and may lead to formal hearings.
Licensees are entitled to due process, including notice, hearing, and appeal.
Decisions are based on evidence presented at hearings.
4. Legal Principles
a. Police Power and Public Protection
The Board exercises the state's police power to regulate veterinary medicine to protect animal welfare and public health.
Regulation ensures that practitioners meet minimum competency and ethical standards.
b. Licensing as a Privilege
Licensure is considered a privilege granted by the state, not a right.
The Board has broad discretion in granting, renewing, suspending, or revoking licenses.
c. Due Process in Disciplinary Actions
Licensees must receive fair notice and opportunity to be heard before adverse actions.
Decisions must be supported by substantial evidence.
d. Professional Accountability
Veterinarians have a duty to adhere to professional standards.
Misconduct or negligence can lead to disciplinary sanctions to maintain public confidence.
5. Illustrative Case Law Principles
While specific South Carolina cases may vary, the following general case law principles illustrate typical issues:
Case 1: Denial of License Application
Facts: Applicant denied license due to failure to meet education requirements.
Issue: Whether Board acted within authority.
Holding: Court upheld denial, affirming Board’s discretion.
Significance: Shows that the Board can set and enforce qualification standards.
Case 2: License Suspension for Negligence
Facts: Veterinarian found negligent in treatment resulting in animal harm.
Issue: Whether suspension was justified.
Holding: Court upheld suspension, noting protection of animal welfare.
Significance: Emphasizes the Board’s role in disciplining incompetence.
Case 3: Due Process in Disciplinary Hearing
Facts: Licensee argued hearing was procedurally unfair.
Issue: Whether due process was followed.
Holding: Court found that adequate notice and hearing rights were provided.
Significance: Confirms procedural protections for licensees.
6. Summary Table
| Category | Details |
|---|---|
| Licensing | Education, exams, application, renewal |
| Practice Standards | Ethical conduct, record-keeping, medication regulations |
| Continuing Education | Mandatory credits for renewal |
| Discipline | Investigation, hearings, sanctions (reprimand to revocation) |
| Legal Principles | Police power, licensing privilege, due process |
7. Conclusion
South Carolina Code of Regulations Chapter 120 empowers the Board of Veterinary Medical Examiners to regulate veterinary practice in the state, ensuring practitioners meet professional and ethical standards. Through licensing, continuing education, and disciplinary processes, the Board protects animal welfare and public health.
Courts generally uphold the Board’s regulatory decisions when they comply with due process and are supported by evidence, maintaining the integrity of veterinary medical practice.
RELATED Blog
0 comments