Oregon Administrative Rules Chapter 695 - OREGON WATERSHED ENHANCEMENT BOARD
Oregon Administrative Rules Chapter 695
Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board (OWEB)
Overview
OAR Chapter 695 governs the administrative rules for the Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board (OWEB), a state agency dedicated to improving the health of Oregon’s watersheds and aquatic habitats. OWEB partners with landowners, communities, tribes, and local governments to restore and protect natural resources, including streams, rivers, wetlands, and fish habitats.
OWEB provides grants, technical assistance, and coordinates restoration efforts to promote ecosystem health, support native fish populations, and improve water quality.
Statutory Authority
OWEB’s authority is grounded in:
ORS Chapter 541 — Creation and powers of the Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board
ORS Chapter 541A — Oregon Watershed Enhancement Fund and grant program provisions
Various environmental statutes related to fish and wildlife, water quality, and natural resource management
OAR Chapter 695 implements the board’s responsibilities by setting out rules for grant administration, project eligibility, and compliance.
Purpose of OAR Chapter 695
To establish procedures and criteria for applying for and awarding OWEB grants
To define eligible project types and activities for watershed enhancement
To set standards for grant administration, monitoring, and reporting
To ensure proper use of public funds in restoration projects
To promote cooperation among public agencies, private landowners, and stakeholders in watershed management
Key Provisions of OAR Chapter 695
1. Grant Program Administration
Procedures for grant applications, including deadlines, required documentation, and selection criteria
Prioritization of projects that provide the greatest ecological benefit and public value
Requirements for matching funds or in-kind contributions
Contracting and payment terms for grant recipients
2. Eligible Activities
Stream and wetland restoration
Fish habitat enhancement
Erosion control and sediment reduction
Water quality improvement projects
Public outreach and education related to watershed health
3. Monitoring and Reporting
Obligations of grant recipients to monitor project outcomes and submit progress reports
Requirements for maintaining records and providing data for state environmental assessments
4. Compliance and Enforcement
Procedures for addressing noncompliance, including repayment of funds and termination of grants
Appeals process for applicants or recipients disputing funding decisions or enforcement actions
5. Coordination with Other Agencies
Rules encouraging coordination with the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, Department of Environmental Quality, and local watershed councils
Policies promoting integrated watershed management approaches
Relevant Case Law Involving OWEB and OAR Chapter 695
While Oregon courts have relatively few cases directly addressing OAR Chapter 695, several key principles emerge from cases involving OWEB or similar natural resource agencies:
1. Deference to Agency Expertise
Courts tend to defer to OWEB’s expertise in ecological matters and grant-making decisions, especially regarding project prioritization and funding choices, so long as the agency follows its established procedures and statutory authority.
Case principle: Courts will not substitute their judgment for OWEB’s technical evaluations unless the agency’s decision is arbitrary or violates law.
2. Public Trust and Environmental Protection
Oregon courts recognize the state’s public trust responsibilities in protecting natural resources, supporting OWEB’s mission.
Case example: Challenges to projects funded by OWEB that allegedly harm natural resources are often addressed by balancing ecological benefits against possible adverse impacts, with courts generally supporting OWEB-backed restoration efforts.
3. Procedural Fairness in Grant Decisions
Parties denied OWEB funding or subject to enforcement actions may seek judicial review, where courts ensure that OWEB followed proper procedures and provided due process in making decisions.
Case principle: Due process includes notice of adverse actions, opportunity to respond, and clear explanation of decisions.
4. Interagency Coordination
OWEB’s collaborations with other state agencies have been supported by courts as efficient and lawful means to manage Oregon’s watersheds holistically.
Practical Impact of OAR Chapter 695
For Grant Applicants: Clear guidelines on how to apply, what projects qualify, and how to manage grant funds responsibly.
For Watershed Restoration: Supports effective restoration projects that improve fish habitat and water quality.
For the Public and Environment: Ensures taxpayer dollars are used for verifiable environmental benefits and encourages public involvement.
For OWEB: Provides a framework to enforce rules, monitor progress, and foster cooperation with partners.
Summary
OAR Chapter 695 codifies the rules by which the Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board operates to fund and support watershed restoration projects across Oregon. The rules focus on transparency, accountability, ecological effectiveness, and collaborative management.
Oregon courts respect OWEB’s specialized role, generally upholding its decisions when consistent with its rules and statutes, while ensuring fairness and environmental stewardship.
RELATED Blog
0 comments