Texas Administrative Code Title 7 - BANKING AND SECURITIES
1. Overview of the Utah Board of Higher Education
The Utah Board of Higher Education is a governing body established under state law (see Utah Code Title 53B) to oversee Utah's public colleges and universities. This includes degree-granting institutions such as:
University of Utah
Utah State University
Southern Utah University
Utah Valley University
Weber State University
Dixie State University (now Utah Tech University)
Snow College
Salt Lake Community College
The Board also oversees technical colleges and the Utah System of Higher Education (USHE).
2. Relevant Administrative Rules in the Utah Administrative Code
The Utah Administrative Code includes rules issued by the Utah Board of Higher Education, typically located in Title R765, which corresponds to the Utah System of Higher Education.
Key administrative rules include:
R765-603: Tuition and Fee Setting Policies
R765-605: Institutional Residency Policies
R765-604: Academic Freedom and Professional Responsibility
R765-607: Policies on Student Conduct and Discipline
R765-608: Program Approval and Curriculum Standards
Each of these rules elaborates on statutory mandates found in Utah Code Title 53B, often detailing implementation mechanisms, procedures, and institutional obligations.
3. Authority and Rulemaking Process
The Board derives its authority from Utah Code § 53B-1-103, which establishes its powers to govern the state's system of higher education. This includes:
Setting tuition and fees
Approving academic programs
Determining institutional missions
Coordinating between institutions
Managing budget and capital requests
The rulemaking process follows the Utah Administrative Rulemaking Act (Title 63G, Chapter 3). It requires:
Drafting a proposed rule.
Public notice and comment (at least 30 days).
Submission to the Office of Administrative Rules.
Final adoption and codification into the Utah Administrative Code.
4. Case Law Interpretation of Administrative Rules (Higher Education Context)
While case law directly addressing Utah Board of Higher Education rules is relatively limited, certain cases demonstrate how courts interpret and apply administrative rules in the higher education context. Below are examples of relevant cases:
Case 1: University of Utah v. Shurtleff, 2006 UT 51
Issue: Whether the University could regulate firearms on campus, even though state law permitted open carry.
Relevance: The Utah Supreme Court held that the University's gun ban conflicted with state statute and was invalid.
Administrative Law Angle: Showed that rules or policies enacted by higher education institutions or the Board cannot conflict with state statutes. This emphasized the hierarchy between statutory law and administrative rules, reinforcing the principle of legislative supremacy.
Case 2: Rupp v. Grantsville City, 610 P.2d 338 (Utah 1980)
While not directly about higher education, it supports the principle that administrative rules must be consistent with statutory authority, and that any ambiguity in rulemaking may be subject to judicial scrutiny.
In the context of higher education, this applies to rules like residency requirements, where improperly restrictive interpretations can be struck down.
Case 3: Utah State University Student Association v. Board of Regents (Hypothetical, but illustrative)
Imagine a student group challenging a tuition increase under R765-603 claiming it was done without adequate notice or public comment.
A court would evaluate whether the administrative process was followed properly—specifically whether the rule complied with procedural requirements under the Utah Administrative Rulemaking Act.
5. Application and Impacts of the Rules
Administrative rules issued by the Utah Board of Higher Education affect several practical areas:
Tuition and Fees (R765-603)
Institutions cannot arbitrarily raise tuition; they must follow notice and approval processes.
Students may challenge sudden fee hikes based on procedural grounds.
Residency Determination (R765-605)
These rules determine in-state tuition eligibility.
Controversies often arise when students are denied in-state status due to technicalities; such disputes sometimes escalate to administrative hearings or court.
Student Conduct (R765-607)
Governs discipline, due process rights, and appeal mechanisms.
Important in free speech, sexual misconduct, or academic integrity cases.
Must align with federal laws (e.g., Title IX, Clery Act).
Academic Freedom (R765-604)
Protects faculty rights but must balance with institutional policies.
These rules have been cited in internal disputes over curriculum content, research policies, or faculty discipline.
Conclusion
The Utah Board of Higher Education, through its rules in the Utah Administrative Code, regulates nearly every aspect of public higher education in the state. While the rules themselves provide granular procedures, their legitimacy hinges on alignment with broader statutory mandates and constitutional principles. Courts in Utah have consistently held that while administrative agencies like the Board have discretion, they must remain within the bounds of legislative intent and procedural fairness.
RELATED Blog
0 comments